Business monthly March 06
 
EDITOR'S NOTE COVER STORY EXECUTIVE LIFE
VIEWPOINT IN PERSON SUBSCRIPTION FORM
IN BRIEF MARKET WATCH ADVERTISING RATES
IN DEPTH CORPORATE CLINIC
 

IN DEPTH
The Bourse Identity FTA Future Uncertain
Red Sea Resort Taking Shape Private Players Tap Into Water Sector
For Business, Cartoons no Laughing Matter Off The Menu Poultry Industry Succumbs To Bird Flu

by amena bakr

the furore over satirical cartoons of prophet muhammad has created a storm of controversy around the world and highlighted the extent to which people will defend both freedom of expression and religion.
twelve caricatures, including one in which prophet muhammad is depicted wearing a bomb-shaped turban with an ignited fuse, were first published in the danish independent newspaper jyllands-posten on september 30, 2005, but became the flashpoint of worldwide protest four months later after a danish muslim delegation touring the middle east circulated them as examples of western anti-muslim sentiment.

the cartoons violate the traditional islamic prohibition against images of the prophet, but perhaps more offensively, insinuate that islam is a religion based on terrorism. outraged muslims worldwide denounced the drawings, and the apparent lack of a timely, appropriate response by the danish government [see sidebar, page 28]. in a number of incidents, angry muslim protesters burned danish flags, threatened european nationals and burned down embassies and churches.

most muslims, however, have resorted to more peaceful means of protest including a consumer boycott of all danish products. the boycott began in saudi arabia on january 26, when supermarkets there began removing all danish products from their shelves. it soon spread to other gulf countries and egypt, fueled by an e-mail and sms campaign. "for the love of prophet muhammad, boycott all danish products," said one e-mail that included a list of danish products and their logos.

according to danish foreign ministry figures, denmark's exports to muslim countries were valued at 14 billion kroner (£e 12.9 billion) last year, amounting to 3 percent of all exports, of which some 8 billion kroner (£e 7.3 billion) were destined for middle east markets. however, this does not include the production of danish companies whose subsidiaries operate local factories in the region, or revenue from transnational sectors such as shipping, communications and services. in all, a sustained boycott could threaten 10,000 danish jobs.

"i think this boycott will be effective because it's not only egypt that's taking part in it, it's the entire arab and muslim world," said khaled hussein, the owner of a small grocery store in cairo.

egyptian supermarkets have thrown their weight behind the boycott by removing all danish products from their store shelves. metro market, part of the mansour group, was the first local chain to take action in late january. alfa market, seoudi and smaller locally owned supermarkets and grocers quickly followed suit.

meanwhile, majid al-futtaim, the middle east franchise partner of french hypermarket chain carrefour, ordered the its branches in egypt, united arab emirates, oman and qatar to pull all products of danish origin from their shelves. a sign on an empty shelf in a cairo carrefour outlet, previously lined with danish dairy products, read: "dear clients, we express our solidarity with the islamic and egyptian community. carrefour [does not] carry danish products."

the decision to join the boycott marks a departure from the non-political role that supermarkets have traditionally assumed. herve majidier, country head of carrefour egypt, says the company's participation is a clear example of corporate social responsibility, and an appropriate response to the public outrage over the cartoons. "insulting any person, is one thing, but insulting prophet muhammad is a completely different matter."

complicating the matter is the decision by some editors to republish the controversial caricatures. more than a dozen western newspapers, as well as some publications in the middle east, have republished some or all of the cartoons. some of these newspapers sacked their editors, many of whom cited the need to explain the root of the controversy.

carrefour was put in a precarious position when french newspaper france soir republished some of the cartoons on february 1. "we are not boycotting french products because the french government neutralized the situation by taking a fast and good decision to fire the editor-in-chief," he said, referring to the editor's sacking by the newspaper's egyptian christian director, raymond lakah, though other reports indicate the government made the call. he added that many papers reprinted the cartoons only to satisfy the curiosity of their readers who wanted to see them, and not as an insult.

in reality, admit supermarket managers, denmark is an easy target because only a handful of danish consumer goods - from lurpack butter to lego toys - are available in egypt. "we have substitutes for all these products that are either made locally or imported from other countries," said emad mahmoud, manager of alfa market's giza branch.

he says the supermarket chain would have been more apprehensive about the boycott if it involved us products. imported american goods account for about 35 percent of store sales and many are without viable substitutes. to remove them from inventory would severely hurt the chain's revenues.

boycotts of us products following the outbreak of the palestinian intifada in late 2000 and the run-up to the 2003 iraq war were widely acknowledged to have hurt the egyptian economy more than the american companies they targeted. egyptian workers employed by local factories that produce us brands lost their jobs, while the us parent firms barely noticed the dent in their global revenues. the boycott on danish products is expected to be more effective because almost all these locally available products are imported.

majidier, however, admits that carrefour's boycott may upset customers who still wish to purchase danish products. "i am not here to be loved by everyone, but i am here to be respected by the majority of people and that's why i had to take this action even though it might upset a few people," he said.

he insists that this is not a case of picking on denmark because it is a small country. instead it is a stand on the principle that freedom of expression should not allow for the insulting of a religion with impunity. "if i am asked to stop working with a company that produces thousands of products i would do it if it's based on a strong principle like this one," he says.

rather than return his inventory of danish products to his suppliers, majidier donated them to charity. an unspecified volume of food and household products were given to orphanages, though he refused to disclose the value of the goods for fear it would be perceived as advertising.

despite apologies from the offending newspaper and the danish government, supermarkets are not budging - at least not as long as the public outcry continues. "i can't tell you exactly when we will return danish products. it all depends on how the public responds to the apologies," says majidier. he went on to emphasize that he would not be the first store to return the products to its shelves.

danish food and household goods are the obvious targets of the boycott, but the country's pharmaceutical companies are also feeling the sting. according to denmark's foreign ministry, pharamceutical products account for 14 percent of total goods affected by the muslim boycott. a media campaign led by the egyptian doctors' syndicate and the egyptian pharmacists' syndicate is urging people to stop consuming danish medicine and seek alternatives.

health ministry spokesman dr. abdelrahman shahin, however, emphasizes that this is a consumer-level campaign and the government has not put any ban on importing or distributing danish medical products. "the government is not part of this boycott; it is the choice of the people. [however,] we have to ensure their safety by providing them with other choices."

he notes that while only 13 of the 4,000 registered medicines on the egyptian market are of danish origin, all of which have substitutes, some of these pharmaceutical products carry enormous health ramifications.

danish pharmaceuticals giant novo norodisk, for instance, is egypt's largest supplier of insulin, accounting for about 60 percent of all supplies. the company has been contracted to provide $35 million worth of insulin and insulin products to the egyptian government in fy 2005-06. observers fear a decision by pharmacies to boycott the medicine could put the lives of egypt's 3 million diabetics at risk.
shahin explains that while insulin shortages were common as recent as the 1990s, local producers such as eli lilly & co., a joint venture between us pharmaceuticals giant eli lilly and egypt's alkan pharmaceuticals, as well as egypt's sedico and vacsera, now have the capacity to fill any gap. he refuted claims that locally produced insulin is inferior to its danish counterpart. "there is no such thing as four-star and five-star insulin, insulin for the rich or insulin of the poor... all insulin produced locally is as effective as imported insulin," he said.

yet amir bishay, a 26-year old diabetic, disagrees. he claims that locally-made insulin is not as effective as the medicine produced by novo norodisk. "the danish insulin is better in quality and has a more effective impact than insulin manufactured in egypt, so there is no real alternative for us."

danish businesses are beginning to feel the brunt of the boycott, which according to denmark's jyske bank has already cost the country 7.5 billion kroner (£e 6.9 billion). dairy company arla foods, denmark's biggest exporter to the middle east, has reported losing $1.6 million a day since the boycott began and has temporarily laid off 125 workers. novo nordisk reported losing a $32 million contract to supply insulin to turkey, while food company danisco said it lost or was forced to postpone several small contracts.

some companies have responded by repackaging their products in ways that downplay their danish origin, such as identifying them simply as "made in the european union." others have shifted their export operations to their less visible subsidiary companies.

eu trade commissioner peter mandelson has threatened to take the matter to the wto, charging that the international trade body could impose punitive measures on countries whose governments are found to be encouraging the boycotts. if the boycotts are purely consumer-driven, however, little can be done.

muslim anger over the publication of the 12 caricatures of prophet muhammad in the danish daily jyllands-posten was exacerbated by the paper's initial refusal to apologize for printing the cartoons, and the danish government's insistence that it cannot be held responsible for the actions - regardless of how irresponsible they may have been - of an independent newspaper.
in a statement issued on january 30, and amid a growing muslim boycott of danish products, the newspaper's editor, carsten juste, said the 12 caricatures were published "as part of an ongoing public debate on freedom of expression." he described the drawings as "sober," insisting the drawings "were never intended to be offensive, nor were they at variance with danish law, but they have indisputably offended many muslims, for which we apologize."
seemingly under pressure from danish businesses and the government, the newspaper posted a stronger-worded apology on its website, which was reprinted in a full-page ad in al-ahram newspaper on february 7 alongside a position statement from the danish government. "we apologize for publishing the caricatures of prophet muhammad, which were not intended to offend or hurt the feelings of any muslim," juste wrote.
danish prime minister anders fogh rasmussen, reluctant to get the government involved in the issue, issued a statement on january 31 that stopped just short of an apology. "i want to emphasize that the danish government condemns any expression, action or indication that attempts to demonize groups of people on the basis of their religion or ethnic background," he said.
the danish embassy in cairo declined business monthly's requests for an interview, but issued a statement on february 2 condemning the publication of the cartoons. "there has never been in denmark an intension or will to insult, mock or in any other way behave disrespectful towards muslims," it said.
the apologies by the newspaper and government were rebuffed by muslim leaders, who said they came too little, too late. "the danish apology came late, so why are we expected to stop the boycott now?" asks mohamed kinawy, a sermon leader at a mosque in cairo.

 


submit your comment

top

   
         Site Developed and Maintained by the Business Information Center of AmCham Egypt
Copyright©2007 American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt